linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: Use gpio_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141007162017.GI4609@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:20:17 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Markus Pargmann <mpa@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: Use gpio_is_valid

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:07:37PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:01:06PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > > Use gpio_is_valid instead of custom check.

> > Patches per driver please, this isn't just a mechanical transformation.

> Okay, but you mean just patches 4 and 5 and not patch 2 right?

Mostly, that was OK as it was just mechanical.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)