[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007162956.GB6652@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 18:29:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: "eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 11/16] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to
perf_callchain()
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:50:45PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> The data is originally from br_stack which is LBR format.
Right, its read from the LBR, therefore this must be.
> What the patch did is to convert it to CALLCHAIN output format in kernel.
I saw that.
> So you'd like to let the kernel pass the LBR output format data to user space
> perf tool, and let perf tool to generate the callchain information?
Right, then we can also compare the two when they're both available.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists