[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141007025057.GA26419@dtor-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:50:57 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Cavin, Courtney" <Courtney.Cavin@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add Qualcomm PM8941 power key driver
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:52:51PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 06 Oct 18:30 PDT 2014, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:12:00PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > +
> > > + rc = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, pwrkey->irq,
> > > + NULL, pm8941_pwrkey_irq,
> > > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING |
> >
> > Do we need to hard-code IRQ flags like this? I'd rather we respect DT
> > data.
> >
>
> We could "move" it to DT but I don't think there's any other combination of
> these flags would make sense. If you insist I can remove it though.
No, that's fine if you are certain we want to react on both edges always.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists