linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftruncate: create FAN_MODIFY and IN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141007192330.GE30038@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 21:23:30 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	John McCutchan <john@...nmccutchan.com>,
	Robert Love <rlove@...ve.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftruncate: create FAN_MODIFY and IN_MODIFY events

On Mon 06-10-14 22:09:12, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 06.10.2014 15:24, Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Fri 03-10-14 20:16:30, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>The fanotify and the inotify API can be used to monitor changes of the file
> >>system.
> >>
> >>System call ftruncate modifies files. Hence it should trigger the corresponding
> >>fanotify (FAN_MODIFY) and inotify (IN_MODIFY) events.
> >   Hum, I would think that the appropriate event gets generated by
> >fsnotify_change() called from notify_change()?
> >
> >								Honza
> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> thank you for reviewing.
> 
> fsnotify_change() calls
> fsnotify(inode, mask, inode, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_INODE, NULL, 0);
> 
> fsnotify_modify() calls
> fsnotify(inode, mask, path, FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH, NULL, 0);
> 
> Only with FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH a mount is determined in fsnotify().
> 
> So a FAN_MODIFY event for a mount cannot occur. But I also did not
> see a FAN_MODIFY event when watching a file either.
  Yeah, fanotify processes only FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH events (without a path
it cannot create an fd to pass to userspace).

> IN_MODIFY events are actually created.
> 
> So would it be better to do the change in do_truncate and replace
> the call to notify_change by a call to fsnotify_modify?
> 
> I just had a look at
> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=notify_change
> 
> There seem to be some other usages of notify_change that deserve
> consideration, e.g. in ecryptfs_truncate().
  Yeah, so the reason why we don't generate FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH in
notify_change() is because we have only dentry available there. OTOH from a
quick look it doesn't look impossible to pass path there from the callers.
So I'd rather propagate path to notify_change() and generate also fanotify
events there than generating truncate events for fanotify separately
somewhere else...

								Honza

> >>Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
> >>---
> >>  fs/open.c | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> >>index d6fd3ac..e36f26e 100644
> >>--- a/fs/open.c
> >>+++ b/fs/open.c
> >>@@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ static long do_sys_ftruncate(unsigned int fd, loff_t length, int small)
> >>  		error = security_path_truncate(&f.file->f_path);
> >>  	if (!error)
> >>  		error = do_truncate(dentry, length, ATTR_MTIME|ATTR_CTIME, f.file);
> >>+	if (!error)
> >>+		fsnotify_modify(f.file);
> >>  	sb_end_write(inode->i_sb);
> >>  out_putf:
> >>  	fdput(f);
> >>--
> >>2.1.0
> >>
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/