lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:44:35 +0400
From:	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC:	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mnt: add ability to clone mntns starting with the
 current root

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:33:39PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:30:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:12:57PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > > Another problem is that rootfs can't be hidden from a container, because
> > > rootfs can't be moved or umounted.
> > 
> > ... which is a bug in mntns_install(), AFAICS.
> 
> Ability to get to exposed rootfs, that is.
> 
> > > Here is an example how to get access to rootfs:
> > > fd = open("/proc/self/ns/mnt", O_RDONLY)
> > > umount2("/", MNT_DETACH);
> > > setns(fd, CLONE_NEWNS)
> > > 
> > > rootfs may contain data, which should not be avaliable in CT-s.
> > 
> > Indeed.
> 
> ... and it looks like the above is what your mangled reproducer in previous
> patch had been made of -
> 	fd = open("/proc/self/ns/mnt", O_RDONLY)
> 	umount2("/", MNT_DETACH);
> 	setns(fd, CLONE_NEWNS)
> 	umount2("/", MNT_DETACH);
> 
> IMO what it shows is setns() bug.  This "switch root/cwd, no matter what"
> is wrong.

How can we move in another namespace without this "switch"? If the task
root and cwd isn't switched, they points to the old tree. In this case
how can we open something from the new tree?

Do you mean that root should not be changed if it points on a detached
mount or on a mount from another mount namespace? This looks reasonable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ