linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mnt: add ability to clone mntns starting with the current root

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVZNDTa3jc2HJ+_9sab+MhdXQ-rgNPHqT8qbDmJGXByBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Oct 2014 15:19:12 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mnt: add ability to clone mntns starting with the
 current root

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
> I am squinting and looking this way and that but while I can imagine
> someone more clever than I can think up some unique property of rootfs
> that makes it a little more exploitable than just mounting a ramfs,
> but since you have to be root to exploit those properties I think the
> game is pretty much lost.

Yes.  rootfs might not be empty, it might have totally insane
permissions, and it's globally shared, which makes it into a wonderful
channel to pass things around that shouldn't be passed around.

Can non-root do this?  You'd need to be in a userns with a "/" that
isn't MNT_LOCKED.  Can this happen on any normal setup?

FWIW, I think we should unconditionally MNT_LOCKED the root on userns
unshare, even if it's the only mount.


>
>>> >> So it is only root (and not root in a container) who can get to the
>>> >> exposed rootfs.
>>> >>
>>> >> I have a vague memory someone actually had a real use in miminal systems
>>> >> for being able to get back to the rootfs and being able to use rootfs as
>>> >> the rootfs.  There was even a patch at that time that Andrew Morton was
>>> >> carrying for a time to allow unmounting root and get at rootfs, and to
>>> >> prevent the oops on rootfs unmount in some way.
>>> >>
>>> >> So not only do I not think it is a bug to get back too rootfs, I think
>>> >> it is a feature that some people have expressed at least half-way sane
>>> >> uses for.
>>> >
>>> > They can still do that if they want, using chroot :)
>>>
>>> It would take fchdir or fchroot and a directory file descriptor open on
>>> rootfs.  Frequently there is no appropriate directory file descriptor.
>>
>> ?  you can always escape if you're simply chrooted.  waterbuffalo :)
>
> filesystem type rootfs.
>
> Eric
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/