lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2014 05:10:59 -0500
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com,
	Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: i915.ko WC writes are slow after ea8596bb2d8d379

On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:03:36 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> 
> I ran into a problem on a Sandybridge i5-2500s whilst measuring the
> performance of GTT write-combining access. I found subsequent runs were
> about 10-40x slower than the first. For example,
> 
> igt/gem_gtt_speed:
> 
> Time to read 16k through a GTT map:             325.285µs
> Time to write 16k through a GTT map:              4.729µs
> Time to clear 16k through a GTT map:              4.584µs
> Time to clear 16k through a cached GTT map:       1.342µs
> 
> on the second run became:
> 
> Time to read 16k through a GTT map:             332.148µs
> Time to write 16k through a GTT map:            209.411µs
> Time to clear 16k through a GTT map:             56.460µs
> Time to clear 16k through a cached GTT map:      50.897µs
> 
> Naively I would say that we lost the wc on our ioremap.
> /sys/kernel/debug/x86/pat_memtype_list remained the same across repeated
> runs.
> 
> A bisection pointed to 
> 
> commit ea8596bb2d8d37957f3e92db9511c50801689180
> Author: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Date:   Thu Jul 18 20:47:53 2013 +0900
> 
>     kprobes/x86: Remove unused text_poke_smp() and text_poke_smp_batch() functions
> 
> of which the active ingredient was just
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index b32ebf9..f4001e0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,6 @@ config HAVE_ATOMIC_IOMAP
>  
>  config HAVE_TEXT_POKE_SMP
>         bool
> -       select STOP_MACHINE if SMP
>  
>  config X86_DEV_DMA_OPS
>         bool
> 
> and adding that back into the current build, e.g.

Hmm, set_mtrr() uses stop_machine(). I wonder if your MTRRs are out of
sync and your results depend on which CPU the test runs on?

> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 3632743..48a8a69 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ config X86
>         select HAVE_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER
>         select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_RANDOMIZE_PIE
>         select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
> +       select STOP_MACHINE
>         select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
>         select SPARSE_IRQ
>         select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
> 
> fixes the regression.
> 
> For the record, this kernel build doesn't use modules, which seems relevant
> in light of ea8596bb2 "fixes a Kconfig dependency issue on STOP_MACHINE
> in the case of CONFIG_SMP && !CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ