[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54348EC2.3040300@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:09:22 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ccross@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] clk: Use ww_mutexes for clk_prepare_{lock/unlock}
On 09/29/2014 05:12 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> I'm also auditing clock
> drivers to find potential brokenness.
>
These are places where we re-enter the framework under drivers/clk/. It
looks like sirf can be ported to use determine_rate() and something like
my "safe parent" patch. Tegra is concerning given that they call
clk_get_rate() in atomic context which is bad because that
clk_get_rate() can sleep on the prepare mutex. Otherwise we can probably
just convert that to use the unlocked variants. I'm aware of the qcom
one, maybe we need a framework flag that indicates that all parent
clocks must be enabled to switch this clock's parent. The last one is
versatile which I hope we can convert to use assigned-rates?
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:409: ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk,
clk_pll1.hw.clk);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:414: ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk,
clk_pll2.hw.clk);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:419: ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk,
clk_pll3.hw.clk);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:427: ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk,
clk_pll2.hw.clk);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:433: ret1 = clk_set_parent(hw->clk,
clk_pll1.hw.clk);
drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:103: clk_set_parent(hw->clk, new_parent);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:431: ret2 =
clk_set_rate(clk_pll1.hw.clk, rate);
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:520: ret =
clk_prepare_enable(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:549:
clk_disable_unprepare(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
Not necessary? drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:168: struct clk
*parent_clk = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
Not necessary? drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:169: struct clk
*pll_parent_clk = clk_get_parent(parent_clk);
Not necessary! drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:181: struct clk
*parent_clk = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
drivers/clk/sirf/clk-common.c:423: cur_parent = clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
drivers/clk/spear/clk-vco-pll.c:90:
__clk_get_rate(__clk_get_parent(__clk_get_parent(hw->clk)));
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c:732: unsigned long input_rate =
clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c:1288: unsigned long input_rate =
clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:82: struct clk *old_parent =
__clk_get_parent(hw->clk);
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8960.c:520: ret =
clk_prepare_enable(clk_get_parent_by_index(clk, i));
drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:102: clk_prepare(new_parent);
drivers/clk/versatile/clk-sp810.c:104: clk_unprepare(old_parent);
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists