[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141008124823.GA4592@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:48:23 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] mm: memcontrol: eliminate charge reparenting
On Sat 20-09-14 16:00:32, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've come a looong way when it comes to the basic cgroups model, and
> the recent changes there open up a lot of opportunity to make drastic
> simplifications to memory cgroups as well.
>
> The decoupling of css from the user-visible cgroup, word-sized per-cpu
> css reference counters, and css iterators that include offlined groups
> means we can take per-charge css references, continue to reclaim from
> offlined groups, and so get rid of the error-prone charge reparenting.
>
> Combined with the higher-order reclaim fixes, lockless page counters,
> and memcg iterator simplification I sent on Friday, the memory cgroup
> core code is finally no longer the biggest file in mm/. Yay!
Yeah, the code reduction (as per the diffstat - I didn't get to the code
yet) seems really promising.
> These patches are based on mmotm + the above-mentioned changes
> + Tj's percpu-refcount conversion to atomic_long_t.
This is https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/20/11 right?
> Thanks!
>
> include/linux/cgroup.h | 26 +++
> include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 43 ++++-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 337 ++------------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 331 deletions(-)
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists