linux-kernel - Re: PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER has different values based on bitness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5435575E.2090308@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:25:18 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER has different values based on bitness

On 10/8/14, 9:22 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> I wonder how that works best, being on the receiving side of such requests
> from time to time.
>
> I guess that to scale, that would be better done by:
>
> 1. Reporter tests if the patch applies (and works) on the desired
> targets.
>
> 2. Reporter sends the request, with the above test results, to
> stable@...nel.org, following whatever conventions are to get the
> attention of the stable release maintainers.

My understanding is that subsystem maintainers do the stable requests.

A patch adjustment is needed for v3.4 and v3.10. I am willing to do the 
necessary patch mods for 3.4, 3.10, and 3.14.

David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/