[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543565DC.8010704@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:27:08 -0700
From: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"Mike Turquette" <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
JD Zheng <jdzheng@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: cygnus: Initial support for Broadcom Cygnus
SoC
On 14-10-08 06:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2014 05:27:24 Scott Branden wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> index fc93800..2dd3f78 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -5,6 +5,37 @@ menuconfig ARCH_BCM
>>>>
>>>> if ARCH_BCM
>>>>
>>>> +config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>>> + bool "Broadcom ARMv7 iProc boards" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>>>> + select ARM_GIC
>>>> + select CACHE_L2X0
>>>> + select HAVE_ARM_TWD if LOCAL_TIMERS
>>>> + select HAVE_CLK
>>>> + select CLKSRC_OF
>>>> + select CLKSRC_MMIO
>>>> + select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>>>> + select ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER
>>>> + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>>>> + select ARM_AMBA
>>>> + select PINCTRL
>>>> + select DEBUG_UART_8250
>>>
>>> A lot of these are implied by ARCH_MULTI_V7, just drop them here.
>>>
>>> Some others like DEBUG_UART_8250 should remain user-selectable, if
>>> the platform works without them.
>>>
>> Will review. It looks like DEBUG_UART_8250 actually has to move to
>> Kconfig.debug as that is where everyone else selects it.
>
> Actually I think you also need to use DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 rather than
> DEBUG_UART_8250.
>
>>>> + help
>>>> + This enables support for systems based on Broadcom IPROC architected SoCs.
>>>> + The IPROC complex contains one or more ARM CPUs along with common
>>>> + core periperals. Application specific SoCs are created by adding a
>>>> + uArchitecture containing peripherals outside of the IPROC complex.
>>>> + Currently supported SoCs are Cygnus.
>>>> +
>>>> +menu "iProc SoC based Machine types"
>>>> + depends on ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>>> +
>>>> + config ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS
>>>> + bool "Support Broadcom Cygnus board"
>>>> + select USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI if USB_SUPPORT
>>>> + help
>>>> + Support for Broadcom Cygnus SoC.
>>>> +endmenu
>>>
>>> I don't think you need per-board config options. The main option
>>> above should be enough.
>> This is not a per-board config option. This is actually a per-SoC
>> uArchtecture selection. More major uArchectures will be added to the
>> IPROC. Will Change comment to "Support Broadcom Cygnus SoC"
>
> Ok, sounds fine, but remove ARCH_BCM_IPROC then. There should be
> no need for a three-level deep hierarchy (BCM -> IPROC -> CYGNUS)
>
I do not need a 3-deep hierarchy, I need a 2-deep hierarchy for IPROC
and CYGNUS (and future SoCs that have IPROC Architecture in common). I
can move IPROC out of the mach-bcm directory if you like a create a new
directory? But it looks like the purpose of mach-bcm is to consolidate
all Broadcom chipsets in it?
>
>>>> +/* CRU_RESET register */
>>>> +static void * __iomem crmu_mail_box1_reg;
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NEON
>>>> +
>>>> +#define CRU_BASE 0x1800e000
>>>> +#define CRU_SIZE 0x34
>>>> +#define CRU_CONTROL_OFFSET 0x0
>>>> +#define CRU_PWRDWN_EN_OFFSET 0x4
>>>> +#define CRU_PWRDWN_STATUS_OFFSET 0x8
>>>> +#define CRU_NEON0_HW_RESET 6
>>>> +#define CRU_CLAMP_ON_NEON0 20
>>>> +#define CRU_PWRONIN_NEON0 21
>>>> +#define CRU_PWRONOUT_NEON0 21
>>>> +#define CRU_PWROKIN_NEON0 22
>>>> +#define CRU_PWROKOUT_NEON0 22
>>>> +#define CRU_STATUS_DELAY_NS 500
>>>> +#define CRU_MAX_RETRY_COUNT 10
>>>> +#define CRU_RETRY_INTVL_US 1
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Power up the NEON/VFPv3 block. */
>>>> +static void bcm_cygnus_powerup_neon(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + void * __iomem cru_base = ioremap(CRU_BASE, CRU_SIZE);
>>>> + u32 reg, i;
>>>
>>> Same thing here: this should really use the device node for CRU.
>>>
>>> Can you describe what the CRU is? Is this specific to NEON or is
>>> it some general-purpose power management unit?
>>>
>> It's a central resource unit with a lot of random registers to perform
>> various operations. To reduce confusion I'll probably move this out of
>> the kernel init and into the bootloader. This will simplify the kernel
>> init.
>
> That would help too, yes.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static const char const *bcm_cygnus_dt_compat[] = {
>>>> + "brcm,cygnus",
>>>> + NULL,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +DT_MACHINE_START(BCM_CYGNUS_DT, "Broadcom Cygnus SoC")
>>>> + .init_machine = bcm_cygnus_init,
>>>> + .map_io = debug_ll_io_init,
>>>> + .dt_compat = bcm_cygnus_dt_compat,
>>>> + .restart = bcm_cygnus_restart
>>>> +MACHINE_END
>>>
>>> The map_io pointer is unnecessary, and the restart pointer should get
>>> set by the reset driver. I hope we can find a way to avoid the
>>> bcm_cygnus_init callback as well.
>> bcm_cygnus_init callback can be removed by moving initialization to
>> bootloader.
>
> Ok, perfect!
>
> Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists