lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54356970.7050805@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:42:24 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tkhai@...dex.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Care divide error in update_task_scan_period()

On 10/08/2014 02:43 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

>   The divide error is rare case because the trigger is node offline.
>   By this patch, when both of private and shared are set to 0, diff
>   is just set to 0, not calculating the division.

How about a simple

    if (private + shared) == 0)
          return;

higher up in the function, to avoid adding an extra
layer of indentation and confusion to the main part
of the function?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ