[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyuH07zzD6dD4k0pdyvJ7fUhFdFrmPYJi9W=FtHihgndA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:04:01 -0400
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@...foot.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: bisected: futex regression >= 3.14 - was - Slowdown due to
threads bouncing between HT cores
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 11d4616bd07f38d496bd489ed8fad1dc4d928823 is the first bad commit
> commit 11d4616bd07f38d496bd489ed8fad1dc4d928823
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Thu Mar 20 22:11:17 2014 -0700
>
> futex: revert back to the explicit waiter counting code
While that revert might make things a tiny bit slower (I hated doing
it, but the clever approach sadly didn't work on powerpc and depended
on x86 locking semantics), I seriously doubt it's really relevant.
It's more likely that the *real* problem itself is very
timing-dependent, and the subtle synchronization changes here then
expose it or hide it, rather than really fixing anything.
So like Thomas, I would suspect a race condition in the futex use, and
then the exact futex implementation details are just exposing it
incidentally.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists