linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Perform rotation on Intel CQM RMIDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141008195956.GU14343@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2014 20:59:56 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] perf/x86/intel: Perform rotation on Intel CQM RMIDs

On Wed, 08 Oct, at 09:02:16PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:04:15PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > > +	preempt_disable();
> 
> < SNIP loooong code >
> 
> > > +	preempt_enable();
> > 
> > Why is all that under preempt_disable()?
> 
> To make life harder for people who care about latencies and
> deterministic behaviour perhaps?

Yeah that looks... wrong.

I'll fix that.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/