lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1412740423-20782-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:53:33 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] workqueue: remove get_online_cpus() from apply_workqueue_attrs()

There are two aims for get_online_cpus():
  1) Protects cpumask_of_node(node). (CPUs should stay stable)
  2) Protects the pwq-allocation and installation

But both aims are settled by other methods in previous patches:
cpumask_of_node(node) is replaced by wq_unbound_online_cpumask, and
the pwq-allocation and installation are changed to be protected by
wq_pool_mutex.  Now the get_online_cpus() is no reason to exist,
remove it!

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   15 ++-------------
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9bc3a87..63a8000 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3776,13 +3776,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	 */
 	copy_workqueue_attrs(tmp_attrs, new_attrs);
 
-	/*
-	 * CPUs should stay stable across pwq creations and installations.
-	 * Pin CPUs, determine the target cpumask for each node and create
-	 * pwqs accordingly.
-	 */
-	get_online_cpus();
-
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
 	/*
@@ -3827,7 +3820,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 
 	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
-	put_online_cpus();
 	ret = 0;
 	/* fall through */
 out_free:
@@ -3842,7 +3834,6 @@ enomem_pwq:
 		if (pwq_tbl && pwq_tbl[node] != dfl_pwq)
 			free_unbound_pwq(pwq_tbl[node]);
 	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-	put_online_cpus();
 enomem:
 	ret = -ENOMEM;
 	goto out_free;
@@ -3921,10 +3912,8 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Install the new pwq.  As this function is called only from CPU
-	 * hotplug callbacks and applying a new attrs is wrapped with
-	 * get/put_online_cpus(), @wq->unbound_attrs couldn't have changed
-	 * inbetween.
+	 * Install the new pwq.  As this function is called with wq_pool_mutex
+	 * held, @wq->unbound_attrs couldn't have changed inbetween.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 	old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ