[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA6VuODM1q5AH_-ZeKnzzsmjquY7ykbHow=aWQAXc38bPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:21:53 -0400
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...oley.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: vdso_standalone_test_x86.c build failure on Linus' tree
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2014 13:55:00 -0700
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2014 01:46 PM, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> >
>> > Fedora doesn't cross-compile i686 builds because of problems like
>> > this. It sets up an i386 chroot and runs all native tools inside of
>> > it.
>> >
>>
>> Breaking cross-compilation is not okay, though, regardless of what
>> Fedora does. It should be okay to, for example, build an i386 kernel on
>> an ARM box.
>>
>
> I think they tried that for a while, and ended up chasing compiler
> and makefile bugs all day. And then there's the software that wants
> to run self-tests as part of its build...
The Fedora kernel package cross builds the other way (ARM on i386)
just fine. It might build ARM->i386 as well, but that's less useful.
At any rate, Peter is talking about the kernel, not software in
general.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists