[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegs4Up_feUbqEGxfhq+rZneTmy0qcZy-k3so7VjufQY7-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:14:17 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anand Avati <avati@...ster.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael j Theall <mtheall@...ibm.com>,
fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fuse: handle release synchronously (v4)
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com> wrote:
> Given those patches must die, do you have any ideas how to resolve that
> "spurious EBUSY" problem?
Check the "sync_release" branch of fuse:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/fuse.git sync_release
And same branch name for libfuse:
git://git.code.sf.net/p/fuse/fuse sync_release
What it does is send RELEASE from ->flush() after checking the
refcount of file (being careful about RCU accesses).
Lightly tested, more testing, as well as review, is welcome.
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists