[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54365886.7010506@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:12:30 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
rjw@...ysocki.net, lizefan@...wei.com,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpusets: Make cpus_allowed and mems_allowed masks hotplug
invariant
On 10/09/2014 10:42 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Raghu,
> remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset() is called on the legacy hierarchy when
> the cpuset becomes empty, hence we require it. But you are right its not
> called on the default hierarchy.
My point was if legacy hierarchy follows unified hierarchy in effective
cpuset handling, we will never endup with a empty effective cpuset and
hence your patch could remove the remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset() part
too..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists