linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend] staging, lustre: fix a sparse error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141009122831.GA3300@sudip-PC>
Date:	Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:58:31 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	WANG Chao <wangchao19890207@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Masaru Nomura <massa.nomura@...il.com>,
	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>, Chi Pham <fempsci@...il.com>,
	Fredrick John Berchmans <fredrickprashanth@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] staging, lustre: fix a sparse error

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:25:10PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> This fixes the following sparse error:
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c:393:9: error:
> incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <wangchao19890207@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c
> index 245c9d7..1510594 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/socklnd/socklnd_lib-linux.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ ksocknal_lib_csum_tx(ksock_tx_t *tx)
>  	__u32	csum;
>  	void	*base;
>  
> -	LASSERT(tx->tx_iov[0].iov_base == (void *)&tx->tx_msg);
> +	LASSERT((void __force *) tx->tx_iov[0].iov_base == (void *)&tx->tx_msg);
is it ok? are you not just suppressing the sparse error?
iov_base is void __user *  

thanks
sudip

>  	LASSERT(tx->tx_conn != NULL);
>  	LASSERT(tx->tx_conn->ksnc_proto == &ksocknal_protocol_v2x);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/