linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] Staging: rtl8712 removed unnecessary else after return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Oct 2014 08:48:16 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Nitin Kuppelur <nitinkuppelur@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] Staging: rtl8712 removed unnecessary else after return


A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top


On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:00:58PM +0530, Nitin Kuppelur wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Sorry for noob question. I am still new to Kernel development.
> 
> I understood from your comment that the patch did not apply cleanly to
> your tree (may be due to change in the code which I have modified)

Or due to changes that others made and got accepted.

> But what should I do after this?
> 1) Send patch on rebased file to same mail chain with (--in-reply-to)
> and [PATCH V4] ? OR
> 2) Create new PATCH and start new mail chain done on latest code.

Create a new patch and new email thread please.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/