linux-kernel - Re: Questions about MTD + flash file system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:43:37 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Wei Wang <wangw8210@...il.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	dedeking1@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Questions about MTD + flash file system

Am 09.10.2014 18:40, schrieb Wei Wang:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have a question about the MTD device for embedded applications. As typically designers are more likely to use an eMMC or block interface-based flash devices + a block-oriented
> file system for the storage system on an embedded system, what's the typical use case for the MTD + flash file system? What's the advantage of the later one against eMMC +
> block-oriented file system?
> 
> If an eMMC becomes more powerful, is there any merits that is provided by using an raw flash device + flash file system?

Power cut resistance.

Thanks,
//richard


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/