[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141009155018.0b8f26f6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:50:18 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
kernel/irq_work.c between commit 76a33061b932 ("irq_work: Force raised
irq work to run on irq work interrupt") from the tip tree and commit
22127e93c587 ("time: Replace __get_cpu_var uses") from the percpu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/irq_work.c
index 385b85aded19,345d19edcdae..000000000000
--- a/kernel/irq_work.c
+++ b/kernel/irq_work.c
@@@ -113,12 -113,10 +113,12 @@@ bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void
{
struct llist_head *raised, *lazy;
- raised = &__get_cpu_var(raised_list);
- lazy = &__get_cpu_var(lazy_list);
+ raised = this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list);
+ lazy = this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list);
- if (llist_empty(raised) && llist_empty(lazy))
- return false;
+
+ if (llist_empty(raised) || arch_irq_work_has_interrupt())
+ if (llist_empty(lazy))
+ return false;
/* All work should have been flushed before going offline */
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()));
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists