[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141009193207.GA5408@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 21:32:07 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@...dex.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] sched: make finish_task_switch() return struct rq *
speaking of minor cleanups...
Let me send another once before ->saved_preempt_count removal, it
looks simple and less subjective.
Again, this is just minor cleanup so please feel free to ignore, but
somehow to me this duplicated this_rq() (and the comment!) looks a
bit annoying. Plus it saves a few insns, but this is minor.
Depends on "sched: schedule_tail() should disable preemption".
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists