linux-kernel - Re: acpitool - /proc/acpi/wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5DD50C84-608E-4A73-B65D-F6369DF7E1D0@osknowledge.org>
Date:	Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:58:30 +0000
From:	Marc Burkhardt <marc@...nowledge.org>
To:	Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpitool - /proc/acpi/wakeup



>On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Marc Burkhardt <marc@...nowledge.org>
>wrote:
>> I upgraded from 3.10 on that machine. 3.12 didn't work for me due to
>a hibernation bug. The rest was left out...  :/
>
>If you still have the 3.12 kernel around, could you test if acpitool
>-e worked there?

Let me ask you a question: does it make sense to test 3.12 again because you know there's something changed regarding /proc/acpi/... or because it's the kernel I broke up on upgrading? 

I could compile one, sure. But I have no time to actually 'bisect' this... unfortunately.

Thanks for your support,
Marc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/