[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1412888588-26755-145-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:02:49 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>, Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 144/163] ocfs2/dlm: do not get resource spinlock if lockres is new
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>
commit 5760a97c7143c208fa3a8f8cad0ed7dd672ebd28 upstream.
There is a deadlock case which reported by Guozhonghua:
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2014-September/010079.html
This case is caused by &res->spinlock and &dlm->master_lock
misordering in different threads.
It was introduced by commit 8d400b81cc83 ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap
helpers"). Since lockres is new, it doesn't not require the
&res->spinlock. So remove it.
Fixes: 8d400b81cc83 ("ocfs2/dlm: Clean up refmap helpers")
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@...wei.com>
Reported-by: Guozhonghua <guozhonghua@....com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
index af3f7aa..1be3398 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
@@ -650,12 +650,9 @@ void dlm_lockres_clear_refmap_bit(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
clear_bit(bit, res->refmap);
}
-
-void dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
+static void __dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
struct dlm_lock_resource *res)
{
- assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock);
-
res->inflight_locks++;
mlog(0, "%s: res %.*s, inflight++: now %u, %ps()\n", dlm->name,
@@ -663,6 +660,13 @@ void dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
__builtin_return_address(0));
}
+void dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
+ struct dlm_lock_resource *res)
+{
+ assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock);
+ __dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(dlm, res);
+}
+
void dlm_lockres_drop_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
struct dlm_lock_resource *res)
{
@@ -852,10 +856,8 @@ lookup:
/* finally add the lockres to its hash bucket */
__dlm_insert_lockres(dlm, res);
- /* Grab inflight ref to pin the resource */
- spin_lock(&res->spinlock);
- dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(dlm, res);
- spin_unlock(&res->spinlock);
+ /* since this lockres is new it doesn't not require the spinlock */
+ __dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(dlm, res);
/* get an extra ref on the mle in case this is a BLOCK
* if so, the creator of the BLOCK may try to put the last
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists