[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1412888588-26755-104-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:02:08 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 103/163] NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code
3.13.11.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
commit cd9288ffaea4359d5cfe2b8d264911506aed26a4 upstream.
James Drew reports another bug whereby the NFS client is now sending
an OPEN_DOWNGRADE in a situation where it should really have sent a
CLOSE: the client is opening the file for O_RDWR, but then trying to
do a downgrade to O_RDONLY, which is not allowed by the NFSv4 spec.
Reported-by: James Drews <drews@...r.wisc.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/541AD7E5.8020409@engr.wisc.edu
Fixes: aee7af356e15 (NFSv4: Fix problems with close in the presence...)
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 663ab1d..b6ed520 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2557,23 +2557,23 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
is_rdwr = test_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
is_rdonly = test_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
is_wronly = test_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
- /* Calculate the current open share mode */
- calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
- if (is_rdonly || is_rdwr)
- calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
- if (is_wronly || is_rdwr)
- calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
/* Calculate the change in open mode */
+ calldata->arg.fmode = 0;
if (state->n_rdwr == 0) {
- if (state->n_rdonly == 0) {
- call_close |= is_rdonly || is_rdwr;
- calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_READ;
- }
- if (state->n_wronly == 0) {
- call_close |= is_wronly || is_rdwr;
- calldata->arg.fmode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
- }
- }
+ if (state->n_rdonly == 0)
+ call_close |= is_rdonly;
+ else if (is_rdonly)
+ calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ;
+ if (state->n_wronly == 0)
+ call_close |= is_wronly;
+ else if (is_wronly)
+ calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
+ } else if (is_rdwr)
+ calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
+
+ if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0)
+ call_close |= is_rdwr;
+
if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
call_close = 0;
spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists