[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141009215228.GA23507@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:52:28 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jslaby@...e.cz, heiko@...ech.de,
yingjoe.chen@...il.com, ibanezchen@...il.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: 8250_mtk: Fix quot calculation
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:23:31PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> The calculation of value quot for highspeed register set to three
> was wrong. This patch fixes the calculation so that the serial port
> for baudrates bigger then 576000 baud is working correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> index 1c4b4bf..4376c48 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mtk.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ mtk8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
> /* Set to highest baudrate supported */
> if (baud >= 1152000)
> baud = 921600;
> - quot = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk, 256 * baud);
> + quot = (port->uartclk / (256 * baud)) + 1;
> }
>
> /*
Has this always been incorrect, or was it caused by a specific patch?
Should it go to the stable kernels? If so, how far back?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists