[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAObsKBZ8irmk0fdEQUvT60ffu0oytVdJTu5s3+BXMCPaosPDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:21:01 +0200
From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Per-user clock constraints
On 9 October 2014 03:32, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 08:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this second version of the series adds several cleanups that were
>> suggested by
>> Stephen Boyd and contains several improvements to the seventh patch (clk:
>> Make
>> clk API return per-user struct clk instances) that were suggested by him
>> during
>> the review of v1.
>>
>> The first six patches are just cleanups that should be desirable on their
>> own,
>> and that should make easier to review the actual per-user clock patch.
>>
>> The seventh patch actually moves the per-clock data that was stored in
>> struct
>> clk to a new struct clk_core and adds references to it from both struct
>> clk and
>> struct clk_hw. struct clk is now ready to contain information that is
>> specific
>> to a given clk consumer.
>>
>> The eighth patch adds API for setting floor and ceiling constraints and
>> stores
>> that information on the per-user struct clk, which is iterable from struct
>> clk_core.
>>
>>
>
> As said in the patches, can you please indicate which baseline this is on?
Sure, this was based on v3.17. Also available at:
http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/log/?h=per-user-clk-constraints-v2
> Also can you rebase onto clk-next if you send again before that is merged
> into 3.18-rc1? There are some changes in the debugfs part that will
> conflict. I'll review the more complicated parts in detail soon.
Ack.
Thanks,
Tomeu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists