lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5439438A.9090407@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2014 07:49:46 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix compile error seen in non-SMP builds

On 10/11/2014 06:16 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 06:15:34PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Fix:
>>
>> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
>>          from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
>>          from include/linux/perf_event.h:49,
>>          from include/linux/ftrace_event.h:9,
>>          from include/trace/syscall.h:6,
>>          from include/linux/syscalls.h:81,
>>          from init/main.c:18:
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:24:3:
>> 	error: #error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
>>   # error "<asm/smp.h> included in non-SMP build"
>>     ^
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp.h:27:0: warning: "raw_smp_processor_id" redefined
>>   #define raw_smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)
>>   ^
>>
>> and:
>>
>> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h:4:0,
>>          from include/linux/irq_work.h:46,
>>          from kernel/irq_work.c:11:
>> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/smp_plat.h:56:30:
>>          error: ‘NR_CPUS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
>>          extern u64 __cpu_logical_map[NR_CPUS];
>>
>> by providing a helper function in smp_plat.h, similar to the arm implementation,
>> and by removing NR_CPUS from smp_plat.h.
>>
>> Fixes: 3631073659d0 ("arm64: Tell irq work about self IPI support")
>> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> That looks good to me.
>
> Note, ARM64 is one of the archs I couldn't test due to the lack of a
> nolibc cross compiler in https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
>
No worries. Even if you had, you might not have caught the non-SMP case.
I only recently added a non-SMP build myself.

Is the toolchain issue out of principle (not wanting to use a cross
compiler that includes glibc) or because you did not find a cross
compiler ? Linaro provides toolchains for aarch64, though they are
only 32 bit. I built one myself using buildroot (select binutils 2.24
and gcc 4.9.1).

In general I have been quite successful using buildroot to create
toolchains, including ones for oddball architectures like score
(after patching buildroot to support it, of course).

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ