[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413049313.2068.48.camel@jarvis.lan>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 10:41:53 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...il.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi: Add Hyper-V logical block provisioning quirks
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 10:39 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance
> > even though they implement post SPC-2 features (such as thin
> > provisioning) which means the Linux kernel does not go on to test for
> > those features even though they are advertised.
> >
> > A previous patch attempted to add a quirk to workaround this but the
> > quirk was only enabled after the features had been scanned for, wouldn't
> > work for "small" disks and would quirk on all Hyper-V SCSI devices
> > (e.g. passthrough disks).
> >
> > The new patches partially revert the previous effort, add the quirk in a
> > more traditional manner to only Hyper-V virtual disks and work on small
> > virtual disks.
>
> This seems like might want a quirk to simply "force" a SPC3 compliance
> level?
This was initially suggested, but rejected by Microsoft because of other
problems advertising SPC-3 compliance brings. Perhaps the hyper-v
emulator has matured sufficiently that it will now work OK?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists