linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] drivers/staging: Removed unnecessary check for LUSTRE_VERSION

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1413063219-11494-1-git-send-email-filipe@codinghighway.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2014 22:33:39 +0100
From:	Filipe Goncalves <filipe@...inghighway.com>
To:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Filipe Gonçalves <filipe@...inghighway.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] drivers/staging: Removed unnecessary check for LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE

From: Filipe Gonçalves <filipe@...inghighway.com>

Given that this code is now part of the kernel tree, the #ifdef directive comparing LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE to the kernel version is no longer needed.

As a side effect, this will also remove the sparse error "directive in argument list".

Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves <filipe@...inghighway.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c | 11 -----------
 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
index 5b83371..78364ec 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/layout.c
@@ -980,18 +980,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_CONN);
 struct req_msg_field RMF_CONNECT_DATA =
 	DEFINE_MSGF("cdata",
 		    RMF_F_NO_SIZE_CHECK /* we allow extra space for interop */,
-#if LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE > OBD_OCD_VERSION(2, 7, 50, 0)
 		    sizeof(struct obd_connect_data),
-#else
-/* For interoperability with 1.8 and 2.0 clients/servers.
- * The RPC verification code allows larger RPC buffers, but not
- * smaller buffers.  Until we no longer need to keep compatibility
- * with older servers/clients we can only check that the buffer
- * size is at least as large as obd_connect_data_v1.  That is not
- * not in itself harmful, since the chance of just corrupting this
- * field is low.  See JIRA LU-16 for details. */
-		    sizeof(struct obd_connect_data_v1),
-#endif
 		    lustre_swab_connect, NULL);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_CONNECT_DATA);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/