[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141011062015.GA19734@dtor-ws>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:20:15 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, rui.zhang@...el.com, edubezval@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, zyf@...k-chips.com, dianders@...omium.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
cf@...k-chips.com, dbasehore@...omium.org, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
cjf@...k-chips.com, zhengsq@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] thermal: rockchip: add driver for thermal
Hi Caesar,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Dear Dmitry,
>
> 在 2014年10月11日 01:46, Dmitry Torokhov 写道:
> >Hi Caesar,
> >
> >On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 06:19:37PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> >>Thermal is TS-ADC Controller module supports
> >>user-defined mode and automatic mode.
> >>
> >>User-defined mode refers,TSADC all the control signals entirely by
> >>software writing to register for direct control.
> >>
> >>Automaic mode refers to the module automatically poll TSADC output,
> >>and the results were checked.If you find that the temperature High
> >>in a period of time,an interrupt is generated to the processor
> >>down-measures taken;If the temperature over a period of time High,
> >>the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it reset the entire chip,
> >>or via GPIO give PMIC.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: zhaoyifeng <zyf@...k-chips.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@...k-chips.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 9 +
> >> drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 628 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 3 files changed, 638 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >>index f9a1386..24845ae 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >>+++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> >>@@ -133,6 +133,15 @@ config SPEAR_THERMAL
> >> Enable this to plug the SPEAr thermal sensor driver into the Linux
> >> thermal framework.
> >>+config ROCKCHIP_THERMAL
> >>+ tristate "Rockchip thermal driver"
> >>+ depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> >>+ help
> >>+ Rockchip thermal driver provides support for Temperature sensor
> >>+ ADC (TS-ADC) found on Rockchip SoCs. It supports one critical
> >>+ trip point. Cpufreq is used as the cooling device and will throttle
> >>+ CPUs when the Temperature crosses the passive trip point.
> >>+
> >> config RCAR_THERMAL
> >> tristate "Renesas R-Car thermal driver"
> >> depends on ARCH_SHMOBILE || COMPILE_TEST
> >>diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> >>index de0636a..930554f 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> >>+++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile
> >>@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ thermal_sys-$(CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL) += cpu_cooling.o
> >> # platform thermal drivers
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_SPEAR_THERMAL) += spear_thermal.o
> >>+obj-$(CONFIG_ROCKCHIP_THERMAL) += rockchip_thermal.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_RCAR_THERMAL) += rcar_thermal.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_KIRKWOOD_THERMAL) += kirkwood_thermal.o
> >> obj-y += samsung/
> >>diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> >>new file mode 100644
> >>index 0000000..ceee2c1
> >>--- /dev/null
> >>+++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> >>@@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
> >>+/*
> >>+ * Copyright (c) 2014, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >>+ *
> >>+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> >>+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
> >>+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >>+ *
> >>+ * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> >>+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> >>+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> >>+ * more details.
> >>+ */
> >>+
> >>+#include <linux/clk.h>
> >>+#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> >>+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>+#include <linux/io.h>
> >>+#include <linux/module.h>
> >>+#include <linux/of.h>
> >>+#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >>+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >>+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>+#include <linux/thermal.h>
> >>+
> >>+/**
> >>+* If the temperature over a period of time High,
> >>+* the resulting TSHUT gave CRU module,let it reset the entire chip,
> >>+* or via GPIO give PMIC.
> >>+*/
> >>+enum reset_mde {
> >Can we spare one more letter? ;)
> >
>
> OK, maybe fix it as the follows:
>
> enum reset_mde {
> TSADC_HT_RESET_CRU = 0,
> TSADC_HT_PULL_GPIO,
> };
I meant to spell "mode" out, like this:
enum reset_mode {
...
};
> >>+ CRU = 0,
> >>+ GPIO,
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>+/**
> >>+* The system has three Teperture Sensors.
> >>+* channel0 is reserve,channel1 is for CPU,and
> >>+* channel channel 2 is for GPU.
> >>+*/
> >>+enum sensor_id {
> >>+ RESERVE = 0,
> >>+ CPU,
> >>+ GPU,
> >>+ SENSOR_ID_END,
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>+struct rockchip_thermal_data {
> >>+ const struct rockchip_tsadc_platform_data *pdata;
> >>+ struct thermal_zone_device *tz[SENSOR_ID_END];
> >>+ struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> >>+ void __iomem *regs;
> >>+
> >>+ unsigned long temp_passive;
> >>+ unsigned long hw_shut_temp;
> >>+ unsigned long alarm_temp;
> >>+ bool irq_enabled;
> >>+ int irq;
> >>+ int reset_mode;
> >>+ int chn;
> >>+
> >>+ struct clk *clk;
> >>+ struct clk *pclk;
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>+struct rockchip_tsadc_platform_data {
> >>+ unsigned long temp_passive;
> >>+ unsigned long hw_shut_temp;
> >>+ int reset_mode;
> >>+
> >>+ int (*irq_handle)(void __iomem *reg);
> >Why does it return int and not void? What is the return value of this?
>
> Fixed. instead of using void.
> >>+ int (*initialize)(int reset_mode, int chn, void __iomem *reg,
> >Why does it return int and not void? What is the return value of this?> + unsigned long hw_shut_temp);
>
> Ditto.
>
> >>+ int (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
> >>+ int (*code_to_temp)(u32 code);
> >>+ u32 (*temp_to_code)(int temp);
> >>+ void (*set_alarm_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg,
> >>+ unsigned long alarm_temp);
> >>+};
> >>+
> >>+/* TSADC V2 Sensor info define: */
> >>+#define TSADCV2_AUTO_CON 0x04
> >>+#define TSADCV2_INT_EN 0x08
> >>+#define TSADCV2_INT_PD 0x0c
> >>+#define TSADCV2_DATA(chn) (0x20+chn*0x04)
> >Unsafe macros. You want to enclose argument in parenthesis.
>
> Yeah.
> Hmmm, there is no thought of a good way to deal with it at the moment.
>
> Maybe do that as the follows,but should be a better way to deal.
No, I meant
#define TSADCV2_DATA(chn) (0x20 + (chn) * 0x04)
This way one can safely pass expressions as argument, like
TSADCV2_DATA(i + 1) will evaluate properly.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists