[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141011113349.GA9962@sudip-PC>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:03:49 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, h@...ip-PC
Cc: Raymond Yau <superquad.vortex2@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ALSA: au88x0: pr_* replaced with
dev_*
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 03:48:11AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 14:39 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 03:20:56PM +0800, Raymond Yau wrote:
> > > >
<snip>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > >
> > > > static int vortex_core_init(vortex_t *vortex)
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > - pr_info( "Vortex: init.... ");
> > > > + dev_info(vortex->card->dev, "init.... ");
> > >
> > > Is it possible to add linefeed since "done/n" won't appear in the same
> > > line with init nor shutdown?
> > >
> > should we add linefeed ?
> > as of now it will print init.... then it will print done as the init is complete.
> > so dmesg will show us:
> >
> > init....done.
> >
> > same for shutdown.
> > but if we give linefeed , then it will become :
> >
> > init....
> > done.
> >
> > the meaning will be lost. and many user might just wonder what is done ?
> []
> > > > @@ -2738,7 +2744,7 @@ static int vortex_core_init(vortex_t *vortex)
> > > > static int vortex_core_shutdown(vortex_t * vortex)
> > > > {
> > > >
> > > > - pr_info( "Vortex: shutdown...");
> > > > + dev_info(vortex->card->dev, "shutdown...");
> > > > #ifndef CHIP_AU8820
> > > > vortex_eq_free(vortex);
> > > > vortex_Vort3D_disable(vortex);
> > > > @@ -2760,7 +2766,7 @@ static int vortex_core_shutdown(vortex_t * vortex)
> > > > msleep(5);
> > > > hwwrite(vortex->mmio, VORTEX_IRQ_SOURCE, 0xffff);
> > > >
> > > > - pr_info( "done.\n");
> > > > + dev_info(vortex->card->dev, "done.\n");
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
>
> It's actually on 2 lines before your patch.
>
> pr_info("a");
> pr_info("b\n");
>
> already emits 2 separate lines.
>
> pr_info("a");
> pr_cont("b\n");
>
> emits a single line "ab"
> (unless some other thread emits something in-between)
>
> pr_cont or a bare printk can be used after a dev_info
> without a newline to avoid unwanted newlines.
i think i was not thinking while writing the previous mail.
pr_info("a");
pr_info("b\n");
should print as "ab" , considering no other threads prints in between.
but after converting it to dev_info it will become :
"dev: adev: b".
and for our "init.... done" , it will become
"au88x0: init.... au88x0: done." ( i have ommited the driver name)
can't we do some thing like :
dev_info(vortex->card->dev, "init.... started\n");
dev_info(vortex->card->dev, "init....done\n");
then even if some other thread prints , then we will not loose the reference.
thanks
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists