[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54392C79.4010607@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 09:11:21 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: refactor flush_nat_entries to remove costly
reorganizing ops
On 09/23/2014 12:53 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> +static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> + struct nat_entry *ne)
> +{
> + nid_t set = ne->ni.nid / NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> + struct nat_entry_set *head;
> +
> + if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
> + return;
> +retry:
> + head = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set);
> + if (!head) {
> + head = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_set_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
This is funny, you call f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc() here with GFP_ATOMIC because
of disabled preemption, but f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc() will attempt to
cond_resched() in case of failed allocations:
retry:
entry = kmem_cache_alloc(cachep, flags);
if (!entry) {
cond_resched();
goto retry;
}
So in reality, f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc can't really work with GFP_ATOMIC,
and right now there are two different locations that call it with that
flag.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists