linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] acpi: Use syscore instead of pm_power_off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:45:31 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] acpi: Use syscore instead of pm_power_off_prepare to prepare for poweroff

On Saturday, October 11, 2014 02:14:16 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The syscore shutdown callback seems to be perfectly suited to prepare for system
> poweroff. Use it instead of pm_power_off_prepare.

How much testing did that receive?

> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index 05a31b5..e03c74d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/suspend.h>
>  #include <linux/reboot.h>
> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> @@ -820,13 +821,23 @@ int acpi_suspend(u32 acpi_state)
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> -static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
> +static void acpi_shutdown(void)
>  {
> -	/* Prepare to power off the system */
> -	acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5);
> -	acpi_disable_all_gpes();
> +	switch (system_state) {
> +	case SYSTEM_POWER_OFF:
> +		/* Prepare to power off the system */
> +		acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5);
> +		acpi_disable_all_gpes();
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
>  }
>  
> +static struct syscore_ops acpi_syscore_ops = {
> +	.shutdown = acpi_shutdown,
> +};
> +
>  static void acpi_power_off(void)
>  {
>  	/* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
> @@ -850,7 +861,7 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
>  
>  	if (acpi_sleep_state_supported(ACPI_STATE_S5)) {
>  		sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
> -		pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
> +		register_syscore_ops(&acpi_syscore_ops);
>  		pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
>  	}
>  
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/