[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2189351.ETD7m2XsWr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 22:16:37 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] acpi: Use syscore instead of pm_power_off_prepare to prepare for poweroff
On Sunday, October 12, 2014 12:35:22 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 12:45 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, October 11, 2014 02:14:16 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> The syscore shutdown callback seems to be perfectly suited to prepare for system
> >> poweroff. Use it instead of pm_power_off_prepare.
> >
> > How much testing did that receive?
> >
>
> As I mentioned in patch 0/2, compile tested so far only. Before I start playing
> with my servers, I wanted to get some feedback if the idea is worth pursuing
> further or if I am missing something essential.
Well, it makes sense in principle, but the ordering with respect to the other
syscore shutdown things and the migrate_to_reboot_cpu() may be a problem.
I always get nervous when the ordering of ACPI-related code changes like
that and the reason is quite weak this time to be honest.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists