lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:32:28 +0300
From:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Mark Roszko <mark.roszko@...il.com>,
	linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] i2c: show and change bus frequency via sysfs

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 12:32:56PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Mark Roszko <mark.roszko@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This seems limiting to arches with peripherals that can support a range of
>> > frequencies rather than fixed numbers.
>> > Also it creates some portability quirkiness between platforms when all the
>> > i2c bus drivers have different supported freq lists and you have to match
>> > exactly the right frequency. I.e. one guy does 60khz but another only has
>> > 80khz.
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand your points here. If this limitations exists
>> they are not introduced by this patch. This patch just exposes the
>> frequency so that it can be read or changed in userspace.
>>
>> > Another issue is in systems where you have i2c devices on the same bus as
>> > the sysfs user space driver. User space could set a bus frequency that
>> > prevents operation with a system i2c device.
>>
>> Changing the frequency is limited to root. Also, bus drivers do not
>> have to implement set_freq if it is thought not to be safe.
>>
>> On a different not, I have noticed that a fixed set of frequencies
>> might not be the best API, since multiple drivers rather support a
>> rather large set of frequencies in a range. A better API might be to
>> expose a min-max range and let the bus driver adjust the requested
>> frequency. I will follow up with a second version that does that.
>
> As two separate sysfs attributes, maybe ? sysfs is supposed to provide
> one value per attribute.
>

Yes, I was thinking of using three attributes: bus_frequency,
bus_min_frequency and bus_max_frequency.

> For the patch itself, I would find it better if you used is_visible to
> determine if the new attributes should be visible (and/or writable) instead
> of returning -EOPNOTSUPP.
>

OK, that sounds better. I will switch to that model in v2.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists