linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] regulator: Add helper function to get "poweroff-source" property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141013131240.GZ27755@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 15:12:40 +0200
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	grant.likely@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, sre@...nel.org,
	dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org, anton@...msg.org,
	ldewangan@...dia.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] regulator: Add helper function to get
 "poweroff-source" property

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:45:01PM +0000, Romain Perier wrote:
> Several drivers create their own devicetree property when they register
> poweroff capabilities. This is for example the case for mfd, regulator

This seems fine from a code point of view but as discussed it's probably
better placed outside of the regulator API.  Making it a static inline
doesn't seem like a bad idea either.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)