[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1413221603.13530.18.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:33:23 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] ima: require signature based appraisal
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 17:09 +0300, Dmitry Kasatkin wrote:
> This patch provides kernel parameter CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_SIGNED_INIT
> to force IMA appraisal using signatures. This is useful, when EVM key
> is not initalized yet and we want securely initialize integrity or any
> other functionality.
Instead of "kernel parameter", I think you meant "config option". A new
kernel parameter would need to be documented in
Documentation/kernel-parameters.
Mimi
> It forces embedded policy to require signature. Signed initialization
> script can initialize EVM key, update the IMA policy and change further
> requirement of everything to be signed.
>
> Changes in v2:
> * policy change of this patch separated from the key loading patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 7 +++++++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> index 44941c1..6a1971f 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
> @@ -146,3 +146,10 @@ config IMA_X509_PATH
> default "/etc/ima/x509_ima.der"
> help
> This option defines IMA X509 certificate path.
> +
> +config IMA_APPRAISE_SIGNED_INIT
> + bool "Require signed user-space initialization"
> + depends on IMA_LOAD_X509
> + default n
> + help
> + This option requires user-space init to be signed.
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 0d14d25..222ff79 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,12 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry default_appraise_rules[] = {
> {.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SECURITYFS_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
> {.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = SELINUX_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
> {.action = DONT_APPRAISE, .fsmagic = CGROUP_SUPER_MAGIC, .flags = IMA_FSMAGIC},
> +#ifndef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_SIGNED_INIT
> {.action = APPRAISE, .fowner = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, .flags = IMA_FOWNER},
> +#else
> + /* force signature */
> + {.action = APPRAISE, .fowner = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, .flags = IMA_FOWNER | IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED},
> +#endif
> };
>
> static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists