[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <527621413228747@web17h.yandex.ru>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:32:27 -0600
From: Erich Cordoba <erich.cordoba@...dex.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wlan-ng: Renamed prism2_fragmenthreshold in prism2mib.c
The idea was to reduce the length of the line (to 80 characters) by renaming this function.
But, now reviewing the result I can see that the name of the function has lost meaning.
Please ignore this patch.
-Erich
12.10.2014, 21:28, "Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:29:32PM -0500, Erich Cordoba Malibran wrote:
>> From: Erich Cordoba Malibran <erich.cordoba@...dex.com>
>>
>> Renamed function to fix style issues.
>
> Why is changing a name, to a misspelled one, a "style issue fix"?
>> Signed-off-by: Erich Cordoba Malibran <erich.cordoba@...dex.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
>> index 0163e06..30d224f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2mib.c
>> @@ -132,12 +132,12 @@ static int prism2mib_excludeunencrypted(struct mibrec *mib,
>> struct p80211msg_dot11req_mibset *msg,
>> void *data);
>>
>> -static int prism2mib_fragmentationthreshold(struct mibrec *mib,
>> - int isget,
>> - wlandevice_t *wlandev,
>> - hfa384x_t *hw,
>> - struct p80211msg_dot11req_mibset *msg,
>> - void *data);
>> +static int prism2mib_fragmenthreshold(struct mibrec *mib,
>> + int isget,
>> + wlandevice_t *wlandev,
>> + hfa384x_t *hw,
>> + struct p80211msg_dot11req_mibset *msg,
>> + void *data);
>>
>> static int prism2mib_priv(struct mibrec *mib,
>> int isget,
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct mibrec mibtab[] = {
>> {DIDmib_dot11mac_dot11OperationTable_dot11FragmentationThreshold,
>> F_STA | F_READ | F_WRITE,
>> HFA384x_RID_FRAGTHRESH, 0, 0,
>> - prism2mib_fragmentationthreshold},
>> + prism2mib_fragmenthreshold},
>> {DIDmib_dot11mac_dot11OperationTable_dot11MaxTransmitMSDULifetime,
>> F_STA | F_READ,
>> HFA384x_RID_MAXTXLIFETIME, 0, 0,
>> @@ -660,12 +660,12 @@ static int prism2mib_excludeunencrypted(struct mibrec *mib,
>> *
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------*/
>>
>> -static int prism2mib_fragmentationthreshold(struct mibrec *mib,
>> - int isget,
>> - wlandevice_t *wlandev,
>> - hfa384x_t *hw,
>> - struct p80211msg_dot11req_mibset *msg,
>> - void *data)
>> +static int prism2mib_fragmenthreshold(struct mibrec *mib,
>> + int isget,
>> + wlandevice_t *wlandev,
>> + hfa384x_t *hw,
>> + struct p80211msg_dot11req_mibset *msg,
>> + void *data)
>> {
>> int result;
>> u32 *uint32 = (u32 *) data;
>> --
>> 2.1.2
>
> I don't understand the problem you are trying to solve here, what is it?
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists