[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <543CE664.5090306@smartplayin.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:31:24 +0530
From: Kiran Padwal <kiran.padwal@...rtplayin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] spi: qup: Remove .owner field for driver
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 01:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:47:57AM +0530, Kiran Padwal wrote:
>> On Monday 13 October 2014 06:39 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> Two problems:
>>> - I'm missing patches 1 and 2.
>
>> These patches are same like this one,
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/58
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/9/52
>
> You should at least be sending the cover letter to everyone so that they
> know what's going on.
OK, I will take care of this next time.
>
>>> - This only changes one driver but essentially every SPI driver
>>> initializes .owner - why is only thi sone driver being changed?
>
>> Nothing more intention, but just remove superfluous .owner field for drivers which
>> use the module_platform_driver API, as this is overridden in
>> platform_driver_register anyway.
>
> My point is that doing a change like this to random drivers isn't great,
> if you're going to do this sort of thing it is better to do it for
> everything rather than making things inconsistent.
>
Sure, I will do that.
Thanks,
--Kiran
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists