lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100 From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>, "jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>, "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dt-bindings: Explain order in patch series On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a > Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs > should come in the series before the implementation. > > This not only avoids checkpatch.pl to complain about undocumented > bindings but also makes the review process easier. > > Document this convention since it may not be obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk> Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so: Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> Mark. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54356666.4090003@collabora.co.uk > --- > > Changes since v1: > - Small typo error, sorry for the noise. > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt > index 042a027..b7ba01a 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt > @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ I. For patch submitters > > devicetree@...r.kernel.org > > + 3) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should come in the series before > + the code implementing the binding. > + > II. For kernel maintainers > > 1) If you aren't comfortable reviewing a given binding, reply to it and ask > -- > 2.1.0 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists