[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141014092552.GG16598@leverpostej>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 10:25:52 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dt-bindings: Explain order in
patch series
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> When posting a patch series that includes both code implementing a
> Device Tree binding and its associated documentation, the DT docs
> should come in the series before the implementation.
>
> This not only avoids checkpatch.pl to complain about undocumented
> bindings but also makes the review process easier.
>
> Document this convention since it may not be obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
Following the discussion around [1], this makes sense to me, so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/54356666.4090003@collabora.co.uk
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Small typo error, sorry for the noise.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt
> index 042a027..b7ba01a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ I. For patch submitters
>
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>
> + 3) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should come in the series before
> + the code implementing the binding.
> +
> II. For kernel maintainers
>
> 1) If you aren't comfortable reviewing a given binding, reply to it and ask
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists