lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 08:01:27 -0400
From:	Mark Hounschell <>
To:	Greg KH <>, Joe Perches <>
CC:	devel <>,
	Lidza Louina <>,
	DaeSeok Youn <>,,
	linux-kernel <>,
	Dan Carpenter <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgap: re-arrange functions for removing forward

On 10/13/2014 10:04 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:56:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:01 +0900, DaeSeok Youn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 2014-10-13 12:25 GMT+09:00 Greg KH <>:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:34:25AM +0900, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>>>>> Re-arrange the functions for removing forward declarations.
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> This patch has too many changes for re-arranging the functions.
>>>>> So I wonder that I should break this up into smaller patches.
>>>> Are the .o files identical before and after this patch?  If so, it's
>>>> fine.
>>> Ok. I will check for that.
>> The .o files shouldn't be identical after function reordering.
> Hm, they might be the same size, but I can see how on some
> architectures (like ppc) how that would not be the case, you are right.
> Isn't there an "objdiff" program or something like that which might help
> in validating that nothing "changed" in the source for type of patch
> that just moves functions around in a file.
> thanks,


Would just testing the thing be of any help?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists