lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 15:14:48 +0300
From:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities

On 10/13/2014 6:59 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 18:37 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 14:01 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>> Looks good to me, pushed to the master branch of the linux-ubifs.git
>> tree. Later, when the merge window is closed, I'll merge this patch to
>> the linux-next branch too.
>
> Tanya,
>
> sorry, I was not careful enough, I merged it and tested against the
> Linuses head, it is fine.
>
> But it does not apply the the linux-ubifs.git tree. There are conflicts.
>
> But more importantly, you did not get the 'block.c' right. There we use
> the same printing macros, but we do not have 'struct ubi_info' there at
> all.
>
> Please, enable the R/O block layer feature and try to compile, it'll
> fail.
>
> The block driver is in 'drivers/mtd/ubi', but it is kind of a separate
> driver - it does not access the internal UBI data structures.
>
> I guess the solution would be to just use pr_* functions there instead.
>
> CCing Ezequiel.
>
> Please, submit a patch against the 'linux-next' branch of this tree:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/linux-ubifs.git
>
>
> Artem.
>

Ok, will do ASAP.

Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
-- 
Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists