linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1413299343.7906.103.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 18:09:03 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mtd: ubi: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging
 capabilities

On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 11:39 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Please use some pr_fmt for this. Something like this before the headers
> should be enough:
> 
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "UBI: block:" fmt

Sinc ubiblock is a device, there should be a 'struct device' somewhere,
so probably dev_printk() and other dev_*() printing functions would be a
better choice?

--
Artem

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/