[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453932.GC4UXrUPRz@phil>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:23:40 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>, Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>,
han jiang <hj@...k-chips.com>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288
Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 13:24:03 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Kever,
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * We need to soft reset the cpu when we turn off the cpu power
> > domain, + * or else the active processors might be stalled when
> > the individual + * processor is powered down.
> > + */
> > + if (read_cpuid_part_number() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
>
> I haven't done a full review of this patch, but it seems unlikely that
> your uses of read_cpuid_part_number() and read_cpuid_part() in this
> patch are correct. You use both functions and in both cases compare
> the results to ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9.
I think read_cpuid_part() would be the correct one, as it does
read_cpuid_id() & ARM_CPU_PART_MASK
which in turn should mask the correct parts of the cpuid to match against
ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9 [0].
[0] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/include/asm/cputype.h#L77
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists