lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141014233756.GH27405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:37:56 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
	Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>, Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
	han jiang <hj@...k-chips.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] ARM: rockchip: add basic smp support for rk3288

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 02:50:07PM -0700, Kever Yang wrote:
> Heiko,
> 
> On 10/14/2014 02:23 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2014, 13:24:03 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >>Kever,
> >>
> >>On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> >wrote:
> >>>+       /*
> >>>+        * We need to soft reset the cpu when we turn off the cpu power
> >>>domain, +        * or else the active processors might be stalled when
> >>>the individual +        * processor is powered down.
> >>>+        */
> >>>+       if (read_cpuid_part_number() != ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9) {
> >>I haven't done a full review of this patch, but it seems unlikely that
> >>your uses of read_cpuid_part_number() and read_cpuid_part() in this
> >>patch are correct.  You use both functions and in both cases compare
> >>the results to ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A9.
> >I think read_cpuid_part() would be the correct one, as it does
> You are right, read_cpuid_part() is correct one on kernel next,
> I mix up 3.14 kernel and next tree, only read_cpuid_part_number() is
> available
> in 3.14 kernel.
> 
> I will correct it in my next version, any other changes needed for new
> version?

You need to at the _very_ _minimum_ build test your code against a
recent kernel, and preferably test it to make sure that it works as
you intend.

Developing on such an old kernel version, and hoping that the code is
going to be correct for later kernels isn't a nice idea.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ