lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:12:34 +0800 From: "'Dave Young'" <dyoung@...hat.com> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> Cc: "pablo@...filter.org" <pablo@...filter.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: nf_reject_ipv4: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel On 10/10/14 at 09:53am, David Laight wrote: > From: Dave Young > > With today's linus tree, I got below kmsg: > > [ 23.545204] nf_reject_ipv4: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel. > > [ 23.551886] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint > ... > > Not 100% related, but why does loading a non-GPL module disable > lock debugging? > (Is 'lock debugging' actually useful?) I believe that we can not trust the debugging any more because kernel taint.. Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists