[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877g01c2ml.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 16:10:02 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, mst@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-api@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 1/3] virtio: support for urgent descriptors
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> writes:
> Below should be useful for some experiments Jason is doing.
> I thought I'd send it out for early review/feedback.
>
> event idx feature allows us to defer interrupts until
> a specific # of descriptors were used.
> Sometimes it might be useful to get an interrupt after
> a specific descriptor, regardless.
> This adds a descriptor flag for this, and an API
> to create an urgent output descriptor.
> This is still an RFC:
> we'll need a feature bit for drivers to detect this,
> but we've run out of feature bits for virtio 0.X.
> For experimentation purposes, drivers can assume
> this is set, or add a driver-specific feature bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
The new VRING_DESC_F_URGENT bit is theoretically nicer, but for
networking (which tends to take packets in order) couldn't we just set
the event counter to give us a tx interrupt at the packet we want?
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists