[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D1C9D752A@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:49:01 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "'Michael S. Tsirkin'" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: "rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] virtio-net: small optimization on
free_old_xmit_skbs()
From: Of Michael S. Tsirkin
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 03:25:27PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Accumulate the sent packets and sent bytes in local variables and perform a
> > single u64_stats_update_begin/end() after.
> >
> > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>
> Not sure how much it's worth but since Eric suggested it ...
Probably depends on the actual cost of u64_stats_update_begin/end
against the likely extra saving of the tx_bytes and tx_packets
values onto the stack across the call to dev_kfree_skb_any().
(Which depends on the number of caller saved registers.)
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 3d0ce44..a4d56b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -833,17 +833,21 @@ static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq)
> > unsigned int len;
> > struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> > struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
> > + u64 tx_bytes = 0, tx_packets = 0;
tx_packets need only be 'unsigned int'.
The same is almost certainly true of tx_bytes.
David
> > while ((skb = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> >
> > - u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > - stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> > - stats->tx_packets++;
> > - u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > + tx_bytes += skb->len;
> > + tx_packets++;
> >
> > dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> > }
> > +
> > + u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > + stats->tx_bytes += tx_bytes;
> > + stats->tx_packets =+ tx_packets;
> > + u64_stats_update_end(&stats->tx_syncp);
> > }
> >
> > static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > --
> > 1.7.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists